Behold, a Pale Horse and its Rider’s Name Was Death and Hell Followed Him

By Paul Craig Roberts

I just listened to Obama give Washington’s account of the situation with ISIL in Iraq and Syria.

In Obama’s account, Washington is defeating ISIL in Iraq, but Russia and Assad are defeating the Syrian people in Syria. Obama denounced Russia and the Syrian government—but not ISIL—as barbaric. The message was clear: Washington still intends to overthrow Assad and turn Syria into another Libya and another Iraq, formerly stable and prosperous countries where war now rages continually.

It sickens me to hear the President of the United States lie and construct a false reality, so I turned off the broadcast. I believe it was a press conference, and I am confident that no meaningful questions were asked.

If Helen Thomas were still there, she would ask the Liar-in-Chief what went wrong with Washington’s policy in Iraq. We were promised that a low-cost “cakewalk” war of three or six weeks duration would bring “freedom and democracy” to Iraq. Why is it that 13 years later Iraq is a hellhole of war and destruction?

What happened to the “freedom and democracy?” And the “Cakewalk”?

You can bet your life that no presstitute asked Obama this question.

No one asked the Liar-in-Chief why the Russians and Syrians could clear ISIL out of most of Syria in a couple of months, but Washington has been struggling for several years to clear ISIL out of Iraq. Is it possible that Washington did not want to clear ISIL out of Iraq because Washington intended to use ISIL to clear Assad out of Syria?

No one asked the Liar-in-Chief why Washington sent ISIL to Syria and Iraq in the first place, or why the Syrians and Russians keep finding US weapons In ISIL’s military depots, or why Washington’s allies were funding ISIL by purchasing the oil ISIL is stealing from Iraq.

It seems to be the case that ISIL originated in the mercenaries that Washington organized to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya and were sent to Syria to overthrow Assad when the UK Parliament refused to participate in Washington’s invasion of Syria and the Russians put a stop to it.

All of the violence in the Middle East, violence that has consumed countless lives and produced millions of war refugees now overrunning Washington’s NATO vassals in Europe, is 100 percent the fault of Washington, not the fault of ISIL, or Assad, or Russia. Washington and only Washington is to blame.

Washington produced this violence. Where is the question: “Why, Mr. President, did Washington introduce 15 years of massive and ongoing violence into the Middle East and then expect us to believe that it was the fault of someone else?”

If Helen Thomas were there, she would ask the relevent questions. But the pussies that comprise the American press corps are merely an audience that validates the false reality spun by Washington by accepting it without question.

Meanwhile, Moscow and Beijing have understood the message. Washington intends war. The purpose of Washington’s lies is to prepare the insouciant Western peoples for war against the two countries that Washington cannot subjugate except by victory in war.

By faithful vassalage to Washington, Europe is bringing death and destruction to the world.

When an Old Man dies, a library burns to the ground


"War is peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is strength.” ~George Orwell, 1984

WHY CONFUSION REIGNS IN AMERICA!

 

By Pastor Robert W. Record

Nothing is quite so characteristic of our Day and Time as the confusion that reigns among our leaders as they seek to cope with our ever-mounting problems. And this  confusion is what we might expect from all who have taken to walking the way that seems right unto them.  As a nation, we no longer have any authority higher than our own wisdom and counsel. And only too often the policies of our nation are directed by those who control our money -- a people who do not believe in Christian Americanism and who are leading us on a course away from God and righteousness.  Such a thing would not be possible if it were not for the fact that our people have lost the Divine perspective of things, and are themselves given to taking the way that seems right unto them.

Such a way of life is designated in the Bible as the Babylonian system of things. And since the way of man is not in himself; it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps. (Jer.10:23), such a way can only lead to ever increasing trouble and confusion.

The American people have a national textbook from which they could get light and help that would eliminate their growing confusion. That Book, or course, is the Bible. But the Bible is little read these days, and less understood as to its overall message, even by those who do. This is the reason we have lost the Divine perspective and our nation is floundering along like a blind man who has lost his way. The Psalmist speaks of the Word of God as a lamp unto our feet, and a light unto our pathway, but we are manifestly walking without that light today. We are walking rather in the darkness of human, finite reason, or in the light of fable and tradition that is preached from many a pulpit as being light.

Confusion reigns in America and the lands of Christendom today because they have been fed the lie that they are Gentiles, and that the Jews alone are Israel! And since the Bible story centers in Israel and the covenant promises that God made with Abraham and his seed, to mistake the identity of this people, or to ‘spiritualize’ them and apply their promises to a so-called ‘Gentile Church’ can only lead to confusion and spiritual darkness.

The Jews of today are a religious sect classed with Protestants and Catholics. They have not, they are not, and they never will fulfill the prophetic history of the nation of Israel! Yet most of our Fundamentalist and Futurist friends are vainly trying to prove that they have, or will yet fulfill, that prophetic history.  We thus have the blind leading the blind and both are falling into the ditch. What is even more serious is, that the preaching of such fable and tradition makes the Word of God of none effect. Its light not only does not shine on our national pathway, it is hid beneath an avalanche of tradition that is taught as being the Word of God.

Think with me for a moment. The main feature of the Abrahamic Covenant was that of great national development. Not only was Israel to become a great nation, but Abram’s name was changed to Abraham because he was to become the ‘father of many nations’ (Gen.17:4-5). This promise of great national development on the part of the Israel people is reiterated time and again. And in Genesis 48:16-19 we are plainly told that two great nations were to spring from the birthright house of Joseph.

Then too, this national seed of Abraham was to be a blessing to the other peoples and nations. This could only be possible as they w ere living and walking in a covenant relationship to God. Since this was never realized in any of their Old Testament history, then it would have to be fulfilled in this New Covenant period. This means that to be a blessing to the other nations, they would have to be a Christian people. This should not be surprising to any student of the Bible for the New Covenant was to, and made with, the House of Israel. (Jer.31:33 & Matt.26:27-28). What is more, Hosea prophesies that in the place where Israel was called, “Not God’s people,”there they would be called “The sons of the living God.” (Hosea 1:10). And so we could go on.

The point I would make here, is, that none of the national promises made to Israel have ever been fulfilled in the Jews, nor are they about to be, and the end of the age is upon us. Neither have the Jews as a people entered into New Covenant salvation. The fact is, they are the most anti-Christ people in existence today!

To therefore present them as being “God’s chosen people” and heirs to the promises given to Israel, has led to confusion confounded. Yea, it leaves our people perplexed and in darkness with respect to the meaning of the events that are bringing this age to a close.

The great Israel nation as prophesied by Isaiah and Micah, which was to be chief among the nations, is none other than our own United States. The people who came here from England and Western Europe, are the Anglo-Saxons, Nordic and English speaking peoples. What is more, we comprise the people who above all others, have embraced New Covenant salvation. And by every Biblical mark of identification we are the once lost sheep of the house of Israel. It is only as we recognize this fact and get back to God in our national life in keeping with God’s Kingdom purposes, that we will ever be rid of our confusion and begin to solve our mounting problems.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

(Originally published in The National Message Ministry-Escondido, CA.)

Racial Theory Evolved into “Racism”

Is it  ‘Scattering’ the Power of the Bible’s “Holy People”?

J. Richard Niemela

The expression, “Racist” is a modern or recent one: its collective counterparts, racism and racialism, emerged out of the turbulent 1930’s in parallel with the growth of control and influence of Talmudic Judaism within the international financial world and in the international Media, which Jews either owned or otherwise controlled.   Racism as an expression, is perpetuated by this increasingly noisy and influential minority but it also has become symbolically associated with a perceived but promoted,  persecution of “all” minorities and it is used in similar context and purpose, as another equally touted “nullification” word -- “anti-Semitism”-  used  effectively to stifle concern over criticism of Jewish incursions into the political, religious, and economic life of other peoples, especially Christians: affairs and issues in which Jews seek dominion.  A dictate that stems from within the pages of their instructive bible, their Babylonian Talmud.

The use of the word Anti-Semitism obliquely infers and seeks to affirm a validity in its claimants geographic origins, but its current proponents are not Semetic in origin, instead, are admittedly Turkic-Mongol, the progeny of the biblical, Ashkenaz; Grandson of Noah’s son Japheth – thus not being of Noah’s son, Shem –they therefore cannot be and are not, “semetic” (See Gen.10:1-3)

The claims about anti-semitism can thus be easily disposed of, but the collective term Racism, is applied across a broader, national scale when it becomes inclusive, by being used to bring ‘other’ minorities aboard so to speak, thereby adding allied support and strength to Jewish/Zionist attacks against white Christians worldwide.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the term “racism” emerged in the early 1930’s, as distinct from the many controversial, “theories of race” which had existed for hundreds of years before the term “racism” was formulated and adopted as a noun. Historically, ones pride in racial origin and respective culture have always been worthy of support and the promotion and adoption of these values were always considered justifiable and worthy – mandatory as well, in some historic instances.

Modern “racism” refers to “beliefs and practices that assume inherent and significant differences exist between the genetics of various groups of humans” – a natural and plausible outlook -- since the historic views of most peoples have always been considered as favoring personal promotion and attitudes of pride in, and for, one’s own race. History is replete with wars, writings and demonstrations by races and nationalities who strove to perceive and present and defend the uniqueness and the character and nationalism of their own people. And rightly so! The Bible and Christianity do express the need for, and demand for racial separation, for discrimination and the defense and retention of national characteristics – especially the biblically promoted exclusivity of Israelites and their Divine relationship which was officially established and as is so often noted in the Bible.

This stems from Divine guidance from God Himself, who erected barriers of separation between the various races. The following verse from Deuteronomy 32:8 speaks to this point, especially to its geographic aspects:

“When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the people according to the children of Israel.” *

*The original texts used “sons of God” in lieu of “children of Israel”

There we can see that God not only established a geographic separation, of the world’s people, but also we find an indication of Divine discrimination; the Divine favoring of the children of Israel in expressions affirming their Exclusivity, their unique relationship with Him.  Note however, the implied association of “sons of God” and “children of Israel”. 

Because the Christian Bibles’ ‘creationism’ does express elements of an exclusivity attached to the Israelites,  non-Christians insist that such historic doctrines are but racism and defame the values of Christianity -- that in adopting Old Testament “racism,” some Christians are “racist” in their doctrines. Thus, many Fundamental and Evangelical Christians who (through Talmudic influence) mistakenly and selectively adopt New Testament values, and detach themselves from any biblical proof of their historic origins – rightly seen by some, as the real Chosen people, defined in both the OT and New Testament and designated as the Lost sheep of the House of Israel—the “sons of God.”

But a mistaken and confused view of Who is Who, is found among today’s naïve Fundamentalists and Evangelical Christians ! The “blinded” or those who insist that proper interpretation of Old Testament guidance falls solely within the purview of Jews and Judaism, succumbing to the assumption that Judaism sourced Christianity while also asserting that OT edicts do not necessarily apply within Christianity. Many Fundamental and Evangelical churches have chosen to adopt this view, but they also have abandoned the original, “Historicist” view of Biblical prophecy and the recognition of just Who God’s Chosen people really were and are today.—even to ignoring the fact that God was clearly “racist” in His comments!

Yet, since the 1930’s and the increasing rise in political and financial influence of Talmudic Judaism, expressions of xenophobic attitudes have been countered by a “nullification” process, induced by those who had achieved dominion over newsprint, publishing houses and the media – hoping thereby, to change national and international racial concepts and tribal values by deriding historic exhibitions of national pride and sovereignty as being adverse to human dignity and a violation of ‘human rights’. The establishing of the United Nations under these biblically adverse qualities affirms this talmudic program to disestablish national pride and  the Divine favor narrowed down to but one chosen element of humanity—the ancient Israelite tribes/nations.

Out of these recent pronouncements and criticisms has developed a controversial opinion that expressions of national pride is “racism,” an attitude adopted also, by other internal minorities, defining it rather as a system of “oppression” – which view, when properly evaluated, ignores the facts that affirm that races do have considerable differences; both in physical and sociological aspects -- in religious differences as well. 

Further, the different genetic characteristics that modern technology has unveiled, confirm that genes among the races are varied, and that such distinguishing differences may have been Divinely intended, but these views are ignored or twisted to accommodate the use of ‘racism” to stifle dissent and agitation toward and against minorities—all the while, also reducing the power and influence of white Christianity—confirming prophetic aspects from within the Word,  as noted for example by the prophet Daniel, that  “when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.” (See Dan.12:7)

Yet, if a historic evaluation of the expression “racism” is done, it should become apparent to any discerning reader that the term has evolved, as noted earlier, into a tactical weapon of sorts, targeting the Christian world and their biblically mandated racial attitudes that were adopted in America long before the time of the American Civil War and as further reinforced from events associated with many other historical international wars over national sovereignty, whose origins can be traced to how and when that ‘influential minority’ used and abused Christian principles and twisted them into being justification for other wars; even WW I and  WW II.  Here, is a modern Encyclopedia definition of this issue:

“Now, racism is seen as something entirely to be opposed by almost all mainstream voices, though there is little agreement over what is “racism.” It is well worth remembering this, when looking at current concepts of “racism.” In hindsight, many eminent scientists, philosophers and statesmen appear “racist” by late-20th century standards; although the recognition of the historical nature of these judgments is deemed by many to exonerate these figures or governments for their ideas or actions.” (Wikipedia-The Free Encyclopedia-“Racism”) 

What this Wikipedia statement reveals, speaks to facts of history: that pride in race and nationality were and always had been, legally and morally authorized, but the Wikipedia authors failed to note that the basis behind these historic voices must be attributable in most cases, to a well-grounded Biblical faith of the participants, as doctrines then taught,  followed biblical instructive views on a Biblical people’s exclusivity - now so vehemently castigated and reviled by today’s seminaries, theological schools and controlled  media including naïve and blinded ‘Christian’ Israelites as well.  

One author, S.E.D. Brown, writing for The CDL Report in an article titled: “The Total Zionist Onslaught On The West” identified the use of the terms “racism” and “anti-Semitism” as words used to stifle any rational, open discussion of the relationship of Jews to others.  

“The problem of race today must always be referred to as a legal, constitutional, moral or psychological problem.  Never can the problem be referred to in its real terms, namely as a biological and political problem.  For that, it is uniformly argued by all the “experts” and the “leading thinkers” in the world, is “racism.”  And is not the racism of the White man—but not that of the black man and the Jew—the very hall mark of the “anti-semite” and “genocide”? 

Indeed, so intimidated has the West become by the smears of “racism” and “anti-semitism” that the people of the West are today, cowered into complete silence.  These terms are never defined so that the victim may disagree or defend himself, but are spat out everywhere as the accusation of some vicious crime, placing the defendant beyond the pale and bringing automatic condemnation without trial.” 

History clearly shows that there have been periods when one race, nation or empire developed its “civilization” before other peoples/nations, and it was these developing national ‘civil’ qualities that enabled them to either dominate or assist other races and nationalities  -  until they peaked at decadent levels of success and power and then devolved into becoming dictatorial and confrontational with other nations – and then this “empire” dissolved. Then, these distorted elements of “civilization” shifted to and were adopted by other more successful, more powerful or “civilized” races and again, the history of the world changed accordingly.  

A period that began in the 1500’s can be considered as the time biblically defined as being just past the half-way point of a time that St. Paul expressed as the biblical period when “the fullness of the Gentiles be come in.” (Rom.11:25). A time when the European Nations, or the “Western World” experienced its Reformation and then rose to international dominion and prominence: when European exploration, conquest and colonization rose to overshadow so of much of the rest of the world. Thereby fulfilling the Covenant promises made to Abraham/Isaac/Jacob-Israel, so clearly manifest in Europe’s Christian Israelite nations, and by the westward movement of their peoples.  

Further, when it is understood that the Latin word “Gentilis” or “Gentile” used by Paul, rightfully refers to these self-same Europeans, as being Israelites and not solely to pagans or heathens, it should be apparent that these European nations had a “kinsman” relationship amongst themselves, derived from a common basis, a common heritage, biblically defined by the persistent use by Paul in his epistles and letters, of the term “Brethren”, meaning, from a common womb -  Sarah’s. “…she shall be a mother of nations; kings of people shall be of her.” (Gen.17:16) 

In Romans 9, the Apostle Paul, of the tribe of Benjamin, even advises these “Romans” - telling them who they were, and how they were related: 

“For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God and the promises.”(Rom. 9) 

From such recognition of Israelite origins and their purpose, no one can change what has been so historically well established, but, these historic Truths still remain obfuscated and cloaked. First by God for His purposes originally, in a Divinely stated time period (2520 years-as the diaspora of the tribes of Israel) but today by organized Churches and Talmudic Judaism, some fearful that the truths of the identity of the People of the Book as found within the pages of the Word, do speak of a coming “restoration” of Israel, of its “lost sheep” - as is now finally emerging! A Restoration of  ‘Jacob’, of these “Tribes/Nations to the status they were assigned at Mt. Sinai when in unison, all tribes agreed in unison to abide the divine stipulations of the Law. 

Theirs is a heritage that was and yet is, very distinct from the “non-western” world, a heritage of Divine biblical qualities as can be seen today - revealed and adopted in the historic grants of Divine largess, of inventions, and the dramatic rise and successes of the Western world – especially in  pertinent Biblical prophetic views related to the Divine Abrahamic Promises which are also recognized as having been manifest only in those lost sheep of the house of Israel which does not include, as Jesus noted several times in Revelation, the “false Jews.” (Rev.2:9 & 3:9) 

As was noted earlier, civilizations rise and fall, and periods of national and racial prominence and control, wax and wane as well. St. Paul understood these historic events as fact, for when he alludes to the ending to that time of the predominant power of “Gentile” dominion; his words infer that it concludes: as has happened throughout history, for his words, “be come in,” indicates an end to that time of dominance by the “Gentiles, or “Nations,” the “Israelite Nations”  (See Romans 11:25) 

(In Rom.11:11, the Hebrew word “Goyim” has been mistranslated into the Latin word, “Gentiles” rather than into its proper definition “Nations”)*  

These words of Paul apply as well to that Divinely ordained period of “dominion” of the “holy people”, a time that concludes when this power of the holy people is “scattered”,  as noted above and from what the prophet Daniel was shown in his time (Dan.12:7) and as addressed by Jesus: Luke recording His words that made reference to the same historic time period as being when; “…the time of the Gentiles(nations/tribes) be fulfilled.” (Luke 21:24) 

This prophetic event terminates the generations of Adam man and his ‘civilizations” and what eventually emerges from this scattering of the power of the “holy people” has ever been the hopeful theme of the Christian Bible -- the Restoration of His chosen people, a people whom the Bible identifies throughout, as Israel/Judah and/or Jacob, members of a rejoined and restored Kingdom, originally designed and planned in mutual covenant at Mt. Sinai – but disrupted by the apostasies of these self-same “holy people” until history ran its course and the eventual Divine interdiction of their adversaries, the “sawtawns” those ever antithetical to the Holy People, defined as the Tares occurs (Matt.13:38-43), and closes this final period of Adam man’s worldly dominion - the time of the Gentiles be come in, or concludes—after a rather brief, promised, 2nd captivity of Jacob/Israel by Esau/Edom – (Gen.27:34-40) that is terminated by Divine intervention. (See Jeremiah 30: 7-8) 

Today, we must realize that the rise in criticism of the Holy People is but part of what is biblically forecast but also it is a confirming of just Who is Who in these last days—before the lost sheep of Israel finally begin to awaken to their historic past and promises about their future.

*Note: The Hebrew word “goi”, or the plural, “goyim” is a collective noun meaning ‘nation or sometimes a collective body of people. But it has been translated into English many different ways. The word occurs 557 times in the Old Testament.  It is translated as ‘gentile’, 30 times, ‘heathen’, 142 times; ‘nation(s)’ 373 times, ‘people’ 11 times, ‘another’, 1 time.  The same thing is true of the Greek word “ethnos”.

It occurs 164 times in the New Testament.  It is translated as ‘gentile’, 93 times, as ‘heathen’, 5 times, ‘nation(s), 64 times and ‘people’ 2 times. These word ‘options’ were available to the translators or editors and account for potential errors in definition and translation by translators. This also led to skewed doctrinal issues that produced  confusion and dissention in the Christian world.  Was there and is there, a purposeful intent found in such deviations?

(Sources: “Gentile: A Study of the Word as Used in the Bible” by Robert H. Becker, and “A Study into the Meaning of the Word “Gentile” as Used in the Bible”  by  Curtis C. Ewing)

 

For all…our old moral values that stem from biblical perspectives have been under attack for centuries - where pride in our origins, our genetic status is condemned and noted as bigoted!  And miscegenation, historically always treated as a sin and illegal, is now adopted as justifiable and proper, despite being divinely condemned. 

The demand that diversity and multiculturalism be considered as acceptable and legal is promoted by a small noisy minority seeking via immigration and other tactics to gather “other” minorities together—to increase their influence and power… But today, many are awakening to the deceit and problems that result from such demands. - JRN