Behold, a Pale Horse and its Rider’s Name Was Death and Hell Followed Him

By Paul Craig Roberts

I just listened to Obama give Washington’s account of the situation with ISIL in Iraq and Syria.

In Obama’s account, Washington is defeating ISIL in Iraq, but Russia and Assad are defeating the Syrian people in Syria. Obama denounced Russia and the Syrian government—but not ISIL—as barbaric. The message was clear: Washington still intends to overthrow Assad and turn Syria into another Libya and another Iraq, formerly stable and prosperous countries where war now rages continually.

It sickens me to hear the President of the United States lie and construct a false reality, so I turned off the broadcast. I believe it was a press conference, and I am confident that no meaningful questions were asked.

If Helen Thomas were still there, she would ask the Liar-in-Chief what went wrong with Washington’s policy in Iraq. We were promised that a low-cost “cakewalk” war of three or six weeks duration would bring “freedom and democracy” to Iraq. Why is it that 13 years later Iraq is a hellhole of war and destruction?

What happened to the “freedom and democracy?” And the “Cakewalk”?

You can bet your life that no presstitute asked Obama this question.

No one asked the Liar-in-Chief why the Russians and Syrians could clear ISIL out of most of Syria in a couple of months, but Washington has been struggling for several years to clear ISIL out of Iraq. Is it possible that Washington did not want to clear ISIL out of Iraq because Washington intended to use ISIL to clear Assad out of Syria?

No one asked the Liar-in-Chief why Washington sent ISIL to Syria and Iraq in the first place, or why the Syrians and Russians keep finding US weapons In ISIL’s military depots, or why Washington’s allies were funding ISIL by purchasing the oil ISIL is stealing from Iraq.

It seems to be the case that ISIL originated in the mercenaries that Washington organized to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya and were sent to Syria to overthrow Assad when the UK Parliament refused to participate in Washington’s invasion of Syria and the Russians put a stop to it.

All of the violence in the Middle East, violence that has consumed countless lives and produced millions of war refugees now overrunning Washington’s NATO vassals in Europe, is 100 percent the fault of Washington, not the fault of ISIL, or Assad, or Russia. Washington and only Washington is to blame.

Washington produced this violence. Where is the question: “Why, Mr. President, did Washington introduce 15 years of massive and ongoing violence into the Middle East and then expect us to believe that it was the fault of someone else?”

If Helen Thomas were there, she would ask the relevent questions. But the pussies that comprise the American press corps are merely an audience that validates the false reality spun by Washington by accepting it without question.

Meanwhile, Moscow and Beijing have understood the message. Washington intends war. The purpose of Washington’s lies is to prepare the insouciant Western peoples for war against the two countries that Washington cannot subjugate except by victory in war.

By faithful vassalage to Washington, Europe is bringing death and destruction to the world.

When an Old Man dies, a library burns to the ground


"War is peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is strength.” ~George Orwell, 1984

WHY CONFUSION REIGNS IN AMERICA!

 

By Pastor Robert W. Record

Nothing is quite so characteristic of our Day and Time as the confusion that reigns among our leaders as they seek to cope with our ever-mounting problems. And this  confusion is what we might expect from all who have taken to walking the way that seems right unto them.  As a nation, we no longer have any authority higher than our own wisdom and counsel. And only too often the policies of our nation are directed by those who control our money -- a people who do not believe in Christian Americanism and who are leading us on a course away from God and righteousness.  Such a thing would not be possible if it were not for the fact that our people have lost the Divine perspective of things, and are themselves given to taking the way that seems right unto them.

Such a way of life is designated in the Bible as the Babylonian system of things. And since the way of man is not in himself; it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps. (Jer.10:23), such a way can only lead to ever increasing trouble and confusion.

The American people have a national textbook from which they could get light and help that would eliminate their growing confusion. That Book, or course, is the Bible. But the Bible is little read these days, and less understood as to its overall message, even by those who do. This is the reason we have lost the Divine perspective and our nation is floundering along like a blind man who has lost his way. The Psalmist speaks of the Word of God as a lamp unto our feet, and a light unto our pathway, but we are manifestly walking without that light today. We are walking rather in the darkness of human, finite reason, or in the light of fable and tradition that is preached from many a pulpit as being light.

Confusion reigns in America and the lands of Christendom today because they have been fed the lie that they are Gentiles, and that the Jews alone are Israel! And since the Bible story centers in Israel and the covenant promises that God made with Abraham and his seed, to mistake the identity of this people, or to ‘spiritualize’ them and apply their promises to a so-called ‘Gentile Church’ can only lead to confusion and spiritual darkness.

The Jews of today are a religious sect classed with Protestants and Catholics. They have not, they are not, and they never will fulfill the prophetic history of the nation of Israel! Yet most of our Fundamentalist and Futurist friends are vainly trying to prove that they have, or will yet fulfill, that prophetic history.  We thus have the blind leading the blind and both are falling into the ditch. What is even more serious is, that the preaching of such fable and tradition makes the Word of God of none effect. Its light not only does not shine on our national pathway, it is hid beneath an avalanche of tradition that is taught as being the Word of God.

Think with me for a moment. The main feature of the Abrahamic Covenant was that of great national development. Not only was Israel to become a great nation, but Abram’s name was changed to Abraham because he was to become the ‘father of many nations’ (Gen.17:4-5). This promise of great national development on the part of the Israel people is reiterated time and again. And in Genesis 48:16-19 we are plainly told that two great nations were to spring from the birthright house of Joseph.

Then too, this national seed of Abraham was to be a blessing to the other peoples and nations. This could only be possible as they w ere living and walking in a covenant relationship to God. Since this was never realized in any of their Old Testament history, then it would have to be fulfilled in this New Covenant period. This means that to be a blessing to the other nations, they would have to be a Christian people. This should not be surprising to any student of the Bible for the New Covenant was to, and made with, the House of Israel. (Jer.31:33 & Matt.26:27-28). What is more, Hosea prophesies that in the place where Israel was called, “Not God’s people,”there they would be called “The sons of the living God.” (Hosea 1:10). And so we could go on.

The point I would make here, is, that none of the national promises made to Israel have ever been fulfilled in the Jews, nor are they about to be, and the end of the age is upon us. Neither have the Jews as a people entered into New Covenant salvation. The fact is, they are the most anti-Christ people in existence today!

To therefore present them as being “God’s chosen people” and heirs to the promises given to Israel, has led to confusion confounded. Yea, it leaves our people perplexed and in darkness with respect to the meaning of the events that are bringing this age to a close.

The great Israel nation as prophesied by Isaiah and Micah, which was to be chief among the nations, is none other than our own United States. The people who came here from England and Western Europe, are the Anglo-Saxons, Nordic and English speaking peoples. What is more, we comprise the people who above all others, have embraced New Covenant salvation. And by every Biblical mark of identification we are the once lost sheep of the house of Israel. It is only as we recognize this fact and get back to God in our national life in keeping with God’s Kingdom purposes, that we will ever be rid of our confusion and begin to solve our mounting problems.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

(Originally published in The National Message Ministry-Escondido, CA.)

Luciferianism - A Secular Look At A Destructive Belief System

Over many years of investigating the mechanics of global events and the people behind them, I have become perhaps a little obsessed with one particular subject — the source and motivations of evil. This fascination does not stem from a simple morbid curiosity, but a strategic need to understand an enemy. Much like an exterminator needs to understand the behavior of cockroaches to be effective, I seek to understand the behavior and motives of organized evil.

One very important fact that must be established in people's minds is that evil does indeed exist. Establishment propaganda has spent immense time, effort and capital attempting to condition society into believing that evil is nothing more than a social construct — an opinion. Evil is supposedly in the eye of the beholder; a product of religious conditioning. This is a falsehood. Just like concepts of beauty, concepts of evil are inherent in our psyches from birth.

These concepts are evident in two particular areas of human psychology:

First, as the work of Carl Jung (and by extension anthropologists like Joseph Campbell) exposed, all human beings, no matter where in the world they are born — from the most isolated tribe in the Amazon to the largest metropolis in America — carry the same archetypal symbols in their psyche. That is to say, we all have the same psychological elements in our minds regardless of environment.

This fact alone is so overwhelming to modern man that some people refuse to even acknowledge it as a possibility. We have been trained like lab rats to see only one path through the maze; we have been told over and over again that everything is "relative;" that each person is entirely a product of environment and that we all start out "empty" as "blank slates."

The vicious attacks on Carl Jung by the establishment (including lies that he cooperated with the Nazis) tell me that Jung was very close to the mark. He had stumbled upon something very dangerous to the establishment; something that could derail their conditioning of the public.

Second, the undeniable element of the human conscience suggests that we are born with an understanding of duality. Meaning, just as Jung discovered, our psyches contain inherent concepts of good and evil that influence our decisions and reactions. The vast majority of people have an intuitive relationship with good and evil. They feel anxiety when confronted with evil actions or thoughts, and they feel personal guilt when they know they have done something evil to other people.

Some might call this a "moral compass." I would refer to it as part of the soul or spirit. But in any case, there is a contingent of people in the world that do not have it — a small percentage of the population that is born without conscience, or that finds it easy to ignore conscience. We'll get to those people in a moment, but first, we should probably define what evil is.

Evil is first and foremost any action that seeks to destroy or enslave in the name of personal gain. The problem is, evil actions are often presented as advantageous for the group. The needs of the many supposedly outweigh the needs of the few, and thus evil is rationalized as a means to a "positive end." In most cases, however, destructive actions do not end up serving the interests of the majority and only end up giving more wealth and power to an elitist minority. This is not a coincidence.

Evil begins with the denial of the existence of conscience, or the denial of the existence of choice. Each person is born with inherent archetypal dualities. Meaning, we have an inborn capacity or freedom to choose. We can listen to conscience, or we can ignore it. We can do good, or we can do evil. Evil tells us the choice is relative and that morality is relative.

Beyond ignoring conscience, we must define the motivation that drives evil. Psychology would suggest that destructive self-serving actions stem from an obsessive pursuit to obtain or control things we cannot or should not have. Interestingly, this is also what some religions teach us, but let's stick to a non-religious examination.

As mentioned earlier, there is a group of people in the world who do not see good and evil the way most of us do. Their psyche functions in a completely different way, without the filter of conscience. These people exhibit the behaviors of narcissistic sociopaths. Full blown high-level narcissistic sociopaths represent around 1 percent of the total human population, and most of them are born not made by their environment. Also, 5 percent to 10 percent of people hold latent traits of either narcissism or sociopathy that generally only rise to the surface in an unstable crisis environment.

I have written extensively on narcissistic sociopaths and the globalist establishment in numerous articles. I have also outlined how such people, contrary to popular belief, are not isolated from one another. They do in fact organize into groups for mutual gain.

There is an ideology or system of belief that argues for the exact opposite of what conscience tells us is "good," and that system is Luciferianism. In my view, luciferianism is a religion actually designed by sociopathic narcissists for sociopathic narcissists.

It is sometimes difficult to identify the true "sacraments" behind luciferianism because, for one, luciferians refuse to admit that the system is a religion at all. They prefer to call it a philosophy or methodology, at least in public. The system also seems to encourage active disinformation in order to dissuade or mislead non-adherents. The historic term for this religious secrecy is "occultism." I would call it "elitism."

There are some foundational beliefs that luciferians do admit to. First and foremost, the goal of luciferianism is to attain godhood. That is to say, they believe that some human beings have the capacity to become their own gods through the accumulation of knowledge.

Of course, the notion of self-worship is a core trait of sociopathic narcissists. Luciferianism just codifies it as if it is a virtue.

I have also written about the insanity of the goal of godhood in the past, outlining how quantum physics and Kurt Godel's Uncertainty Principle make total scientific and mathematical understanding of the universe impossible. This does not stop luciferian circles from destructively chasing that which they cannot have.

Second, luciferians seek to elevate the individual in general, which in the minds of many people doesn't sound like a negative at all. I have argued for the importance of individualism in the midst of societal controls often. But any ideology can be taken to extremes.

The problem is that the pursuit of individual gratification can be pushed too far, to the point that the people around us begin to suffer. Because of the elitist nature of luciferianism, there is a tendency to view non-adherents as "inferior;" stupid people that perhaps deserve to be sheared like sheep by those who are chasing a dream of personal godhood.

This attitude can be seen in the common actions of narcissistic sociopaths, who have no qualms about conning or exploiting people around them as resources, feeding off others like parasites. They treat this as an acceptable practice because they see themselves as "special;" they are destined to achieve more. They are meant to do great things, and their image is meant to be cemented in the foundations of history.

The elitism of luciferianism is hardly hidden. Luciferians claim that they have no interest in converting other people, instead, adherents have to be "smart enough" to come to the belief system on their own. However, their goal of influencing social and political spheres is rather evident.

Political gatekeepers, though not openly luciferian, tend to let slip their affiliations at times. Saul Alinsky, a high-level leftist organizer and democrat gatekeeper, praises the rebellious Lucifer in the personal acknowledgments of his political manual Rules for Radicals, in which he says:

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.

Luciferianism is also prevalent in globalist institutions. For example, the U.N. seems to be highly involved in the ideology through groups like Lucis Trust, a publishing house founded on luciferian beliefs. Former U.N. directors like Robert Muller are tied closely with Lucis Trust and openly promote luciferianism. Muller was central to the U.N.'s global education policies for children.

Luciferians sometimes argue that the mythological figure of Lucifer is separate from the Christian image of "Satan." The name "Lucifer" is not mentioned directly in the Bible in reference to Satan (though the phrase "morning star," the direct translation of the word "Lucifer" is mentioned in reference to Satan). But this argument seems rather coy and disingenuous to me.  For centuries, the term Lucifer has been synonymous with the devil in the public consciousness. Luciferians seem to be trying to separate themselves from the negative connotations associated with satanism through a twisted form of wordplay and semantics.

Other Luciferians try to dissociate from satanism by claiming that Lucifer as a mythological figure is Satan "before the fall" described in the bible. Yes, they believe there are two versions of Satan that are distinct from each other. This amounts to a sort of laughable good cop/bad cop representation of Satan.

Satanists often refer to Lucifer and Satan in the same breath as being the same figure. In this documentary, Anton LaVey, a former circus performer and well-known figure in satanic and luciferian circles, does exactly that.

LaVey seems to be treated as an annoyance by the more discreet luciferian groups. I suspect that his public bluntness about what luciferian beliefs actually involve is seen as too honest. These people believe in secrecy and initiation to condition adherents to the darker side of the system. They don't like the darker side on display for the whole world to see and to judge.

A direct antithesis to someone like Anton LaVey would be Michael Aquino, a military intelligence officer specializing in psychological warfare who was a member of LaVey's satanic church. Aquino is best known for a tactical thesis on psychological warfare he wrote with then General Paul Vallely called "Mind War." The thesis outlines the use of propaganda and other strategies to turn a target population against itself, to either destroy that population or control it more easily.

Aquino left LaVey's more theatrical but more open satanic church and launched his own Temple of Set, which appears to fall in line with the disinformation and secrecy inherent in luciferianism.

The duplicity of luciferianism alone should be enough to make people wary of its promises and arguments. Humanity has spent the better part of 2,000 years trying to remove the influences of secretive occult elitism from our political and social structures. Yet, these people are relentless in their desire for power.

Regardless of the positive spin that luciferians adopt for their ideology, the fruits of their activities speak much louder than propaganda. What I see is a cancerous desire for control, over civilization and of every aspect of human thought. I also see a perversion of nature as they seek to obtain what they call "godhood." Transhumanism and genetic tampering carry all the hallmarks of the luciferian ideal. Regardless of one's religious affiliations, it is hard to find anything of value in their system. Everything about it is an affront to inherent conscience. It can only become acceptable to the majority through trickery.

If you have to lie about the motives of your philosophy in order to get people to adopt your philosophy, then your philosophy must be dangerously incomplete or outright cataclysmic.


Yours for the truth, Bob Livingston
Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter™

Personal Liberty Media Group 
Post Office Box 1105 
Cullman, AL 35056