Racial Theory Evolved into “Racism”
Is it ‘Scattering’ the Power of the Bible’s “Holy People”?
J. Richard Niemela
The expression, “Racist” is a modern or recent one: its collective counterparts, racism and racialism, emerged out of the turbulent 1930’s in parallel with the growth of control and influence of Talmudic Judaism within the international financial world and in the international Media, which Jews either owned or otherwise controlled. Racism as an expression, is perpetuated by this increasingly noisy and influential minority but it also has become symbolically associated with a perceived but promoted, persecution of “all” minorities and it is used in similar context and purpose, as another equally touted “nullification” word -- “anti-Semitism”- used effectively to stifle concern over criticism of Jewish incursions into the political, religious, and economic life of other peoples, especially Christians: affairs and issues in which Jews seek dominion. A dictate that stems from within the pages of their instructive bible, their Babylonian Talmud.
The use of the word Anti-Semitism obliquely infers and seeks to affirm a validity in its claimants geographic origins, but its current proponents are not Semetic in origin, instead, are admittedly Turkic-Mongol, the progeny of the biblical, Ashkenaz; Grandson of Noah’s son Japheth – thus not being of Noah’s son, Shem –they therefore cannot be and are not, “semetic” (See Gen.10:1-3)
The claims about anti-semitism can thus be easily disposed of, but the collective term Racism, is applied across a broader, national scale when it becomes inclusive, by being used to bring ‘other’ minorities aboard so to speak, thereby adding allied support and strength to Jewish/Zionist attacks against white Christians worldwide.
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the term “racism” emerged in the early 1930’s, as distinct from the many controversial, “theories of race” which had existed for hundreds of years before the term “racism” was formulated and adopted as a noun. Historically, ones pride in racial origin and respective culture have always been worthy of support and the promotion and adoption of these values were always considered justifiable and worthy – mandatory as well, in some historic instances.
Modern “racism” refers to “beliefs and practices that assume inherent and significant differences exist between the genetics of various groups of humans” – a natural and plausible outlook -- since the historic views of most peoples have always been considered as favoring personal promotion and attitudes of pride in, and for, one’s own race. History is replete with wars, writings and demonstrations by races and nationalities who strove to perceive and present and defend the uniqueness and the character and nationalism of their own people. And rightly so! The Bible and Christianity do express the need for, and demand for racial separation, for discrimination and the defense and retention of national characteristics – especially the biblically promoted exclusivity of Israelites and their Divine relationship which was officially established and as is so often noted in the Bible.
This stems from Divine guidance from God Himself, who erected barriers of separation between the various races. The following verse from Deuteronomy 32:8 speaks to this point, especially to its geographic aspects:
“When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the people according to the children of Israel.” *
*The original texts used “sons of God” in lieu of “children of Israel”
There we can see that God not only established a geographic separation, of the world’s people, but also we find an indication of Divine discrimination; the Divine favoring of the children of Israel in expressions affirming their Exclusivity, their unique relationship with Him. Note however, the implied association of “sons of God” and “children of Israel”.
Because the Christian Bibles’ ‘creationism’ does express elements of an exclusivity attached to the Israelites, non-Christians insist that such historic doctrines are but racism and defame the values of Christianity -- that in adopting Old Testament “racism,” some Christians are “racist” in their doctrines. Thus, many Fundamental and Evangelical Christians who (through Talmudic influence) mistakenly and selectively adopt New Testament values, and detach themselves from any biblical proof of their historic origins – rightly seen by some, as the real Chosen people, defined in both the OT and New Testament and designated as the Lost sheep of the House of Israel—the “sons of God.”
But a mistaken and confused view of Who is Who, is found among today’s naïve Fundamentalists and Evangelical Christians ! The “blinded” or those who insist that proper interpretation of Old Testament guidance falls solely within the purview of Jews and Judaism, succumbing to the assumption that Judaism sourced Christianity while also asserting that OT edicts do not necessarily apply within Christianity. Many Fundamental and Evangelical churches have chosen to adopt this view, but they also have abandoned the original, “Historicist” view of Biblical prophecy and the recognition of just Who God’s Chosen people really were and are today.—even to ignoring the fact that God was clearly “racist” in His comments!
Yet, since the 1930’s and the increasing rise in political and financial influence of Talmudic Judaism, expressions of xenophobic attitudes have been countered by a “nullification” process, induced by those who had achieved dominion over newsprint, publishing houses and the media – hoping thereby, to change national and international racial concepts and tribal values by deriding historic exhibitions of national pride and sovereignty as being adverse to human dignity and a violation of ‘human rights’. The establishing of the United Nations under these biblically adverse qualities affirms this talmudic program to disestablish national pride and the Divine favor narrowed down to but one chosen element of humanity—the ancient Israelite tribes/nations.
Out of these recent pronouncements and criticisms has developed a controversial opinion that expressions of national pride is “racism,” an attitude adopted also, by other internal minorities, defining it rather as a system of “oppression” – which view, when properly evaluated, ignores the facts that affirm that races do have considerable differences; both in physical and sociological aspects -- in religious differences as well.
Further, the different genetic characteristics that modern technology has unveiled, confirm that genes among the races are varied, and that such distinguishing differences may have been Divinely intended, but these views are ignored or twisted to accommodate the use of ‘racism” to stifle dissent and agitation toward and against minorities—all the while, also reducing the power and influence of white Christianity—confirming prophetic aspects from within the Word, as noted for example by the prophet Daniel, that “when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.” (See Dan.12:7)
Yet, if a historic evaluation of the expression “racism” is done, it should become apparent to any discerning reader that the term has evolved, as noted earlier, into a tactical weapon of sorts, targeting the Christian world and their biblically mandated racial attitudes that were adopted in America long before the time of the American Civil War and as further reinforced from events associated with many other historical international wars over national sovereignty, whose origins can be traced to how and when that ‘influential minority’ used and abused Christian principles and twisted them into being justification for other wars; even WW I and WW II. Here, is a modern Encyclopedia definition of this issue:
“Now, racism is seen as something entirely to be opposed by almost all mainstream voices, though there is little agreement over what is “racism.” It is well worth remembering this, when looking at current concepts of “racism.” In hindsight, many eminent scientists, philosophers and statesmen appear “racist” by late-20th century standards; although the recognition of the historical nature of these judgments is deemed by many to exonerate these figures or governments for their ideas or actions.” (Wikipedia-The Free Encyclopedia-“Racism”)
What this Wikipedia statement reveals, speaks to facts of history: that pride in race and nationality were and always had been, legally and morally authorized, but the Wikipedia authors failed to note that the basis behind these historic voices must be attributable in most cases, to a well-grounded Biblical faith of the participants, as doctrines then taught, followed biblical instructive views on a Biblical people’s exclusivity - now so vehemently castigated and reviled by today’s seminaries, theological schools and controlled media including naïve and blinded ‘Christian’ Israelites as well.
One author, S.E.D. Brown, writing for The CDL Report in an article titled: “The Total Zionist Onslaught On The West” identified the use of the terms “racism” and “anti-Semitism” as words used to stifle any rational, open discussion of the relationship of Jews to others.
“The problem of race today must always be referred to as a legal, constitutional, moral or psychological problem. Never can the problem be referred to in its real terms, namely as a biological and political problem. For that, it is uniformly argued by all the “experts” and the “leading thinkers” in the world, is “racism.” And is not the racism of the White man—but not that of the black man and the Jew—the very hall mark of the “anti-semite” and “genocide”?
Indeed, so intimidated has the West become by the smears of “racism” and “anti-semitism” that the people of the West are today, cowered into complete silence. These terms are never defined so that the victim may disagree or defend himself, but are spat out everywhere as the accusation of some vicious crime, placing the defendant beyond the pale and bringing automatic condemnation without trial.”
History clearly shows that there have been periods when one race, nation or empire developed its “civilization” before other peoples/nations, and it was these developing national ‘civil’ qualities that enabled them to either dominate or assist other races and nationalities - until they peaked at decadent levels of success and power and then devolved into becoming dictatorial and confrontational with other nations – and then this “empire” dissolved. Then, these distorted elements of “civilization” shifted to and were adopted by other more successful, more powerful or “civilized” races and again, the history of the world changed accordingly.
A period that began in the 1500’s can be considered as the time biblically defined as being just past the half-way point of a time that St. Paul expressed as the biblical period when “the fullness of the Gentiles be come in.” (Rom.11:25). A time when the European Nations, or the “Western World” experienced its Reformation and then rose to international dominion and prominence: when European exploration, conquest and colonization rose to overshadow so of much of the rest of the world. Thereby fulfilling the Covenant promises made to Abraham/Isaac/Jacob-Israel, so clearly manifest in Europe’s Christian Israelite nations, and by the westward movement of their peoples.
Further, when it is understood that the Latin word “Gentilis” or “Gentile” used by Paul, rightfully refers to these self-same Europeans, as being Israelites and not solely to pagans or heathens, it should be apparent that these European nations had a “kinsman” relationship amongst themselves, derived from a common basis, a common heritage, biblically defined by the persistent use by Paul in his epistles and letters, of the term “Brethren”, meaning, from a common womb - Sarah’s. “…she shall be a mother of nations; kings of people shall be of her.” (Gen.17:16)
In Romans 9, the Apostle Paul, of the tribe of Benjamin, even advises these “Romans” - telling them who they were, and how they were related:
“For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God and the promises.”(Rom. 9)
From such recognition of Israelite origins and their purpose, no one can change what has been so historically well established, but, these historic Truths still remain obfuscated and cloaked. First by God for His purposes originally, in a Divinely stated time period (2520 years-as the diaspora of the tribes of Israel) but today by organized Churches and Talmudic Judaism, some fearful that the truths of the identity of the People of the Book as found within the pages of the Word, do speak of a coming “restoration” of Israel, of its “lost sheep” - as is now finally emerging! A Restoration of ‘Jacob’, of these “Tribes/Nations to the status they were assigned at Mt. Sinai when in unison, all tribes agreed in unison to abide the divine stipulations of the Law.
Theirs is a heritage that was and yet is, very distinct from the “non-western” world, a heritage of Divine biblical qualities as can be seen today - revealed and adopted in the historic grants of Divine largess, of inventions, and the dramatic rise and successes of the Western world – especially in pertinent Biblical prophetic views related to the Divine Abrahamic Promises which are also recognized as having been manifest only in those lost sheep of the house of Israel which does not include, as Jesus noted several times in Revelation, the “false Jews.” (Rev.2:9 & 3:9)
As was noted earlier, civilizations rise and fall, and periods of national and racial prominence and control, wax and wane as well. St. Paul understood these historic events as fact, for when he alludes to the ending to that time of the predominant power of “Gentile” dominion; his words infer that it concludes: as has happened throughout history, for his words, “be come in,” indicates an end to that time of dominance by the “Gentiles, or “Nations,” the “Israelite Nations” (See Romans 11:25)
(In Rom.11:11, the Hebrew word “Goyim” has been mistranslated into the Latin word, “Gentiles” rather than into its proper definition “Nations”)*
These words of Paul apply as well to that Divinely ordained period of “dominion” of the “holy people”, a time that concludes when this power of the holy people is “scattered”, as noted above and from what the prophet Daniel was shown in his time (Dan.12:7) and as addressed by Jesus: Luke recording His words that made reference to the same historic time period as being when; “…the time of the Gentiles(nations/tribes) be fulfilled.” (Luke 21:24)
This prophetic event terminates the generations of Adam man and his ‘civilizations” and what eventually emerges from this scattering of the power of the “holy people” has ever been the hopeful theme of the Christian Bible -- the Restoration of His chosen people, a people whom the Bible identifies throughout, as Israel/Judah and/or Jacob, members of a rejoined and restored Kingdom, originally designed and planned in mutual covenant at Mt. Sinai – but disrupted by the apostasies of these self-same “holy people” until history ran its course and the eventual Divine interdiction of their adversaries, the “sawtawns” those ever antithetical to the Holy People, defined as the Tares occurs (Matt.13:38-43), and closes this final period of Adam man’s worldly dominion - the time of the Gentiles be come in, or concludes—after a rather brief, promised, 2nd captivity of Jacob/Israel by Esau/Edom – (Gen.27:34-40) that is terminated by Divine intervention. (See Jeremiah 30: 7-8)
Today, we must realize that the rise in criticism of the Holy People is but part of what is biblically forecast but also it is a confirming of just Who is Who in these last days—before the lost sheep of Israel finally begin to awaken to their historic past and promises about their future.
*Note: The Hebrew word “goi”, or the plural, “goyim” is a collective noun meaning ‘nation or sometimes a collective body of people. But it has been translated into English many different ways. The word occurs 557 times in the Old Testament. It is translated as ‘gentile’, 30 times, ‘heathen’, 142 times; ‘nation(s)’ 373 times, ‘people’ 11 times, ‘another’, 1 time. The same thing is true of the Greek word “ethnos”.
It occurs 164 times in the New Testament. It is translated as ‘gentile’, 93 times, as ‘heathen’, 5 times, ‘nation(s), 64 times and ‘people’ 2 times. These word ‘options’ were available to the translators or editors and account for potential errors in definition and translation by translators. This also led to skewed doctrinal issues that produced confusion and dissention in the Christian world. Was there and is there, a purposeful intent found in such deviations?
(Sources: “Gentile: A Study of the Word as Used in the Bible” by Robert H. Becker, and “A Study into the Meaning of the Word “Gentile” as Used in the Bible” by Curtis C. Ewing)